User talk:PaperTyler

Hotelling's law
Hello--I'm not sure if I agree with you on "high" importance, but I won't change it back until we go through the next biggish reassessment. As for etiquette--as long as you're making good faith changes and discuss politely when other editors disagree, I think you're fine. The assessment discussion page you posted on we were trying to use for forming general guidelines, rather than specific articles... Anyway, hello! You're fine. C RETOG 8(t/c) 06:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help and for properly formatting my comments. Should the comment on level of importance be moved to Talk:Hotelling's law or is there another more proper forum for such a discussion. Your advice is greatly valued. Best, PaperTyler (talk) 15:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The discussion of importance could be there on the Talk:Hotelling's law page, that's probably simplest. Alternatively, you could bring such a thing to WikiProject Economics talk. Honestly, the way things would usually go is: (1) You change it, with little comment (some mention on edit summary line is good, but nothing extra needed on talk page), (2) If/when anyone objects, they might revert, (3) then you discuss.


 * You might want to join WikiProject Economics. You can do so by following instructions here. I like the userbox approach myself, just put on your user page. Above is links for more general wiki help. C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)