User talk:Paperbackrighter

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Deb 12:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Creating links
Whilst your enthusiasm is to be commended, please could you take a step back, and read up on the correct format for links, as at present you are repeatedly adding links in the wrong format!

Internal Links

Name of Page

text to show

External Links



text to show

Doing it wrong just means somebody has to clean it up Mayalld 16:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Diana book and conflicts of interest
So far, all your contributions have been covering a single book about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. This fact, plus your username, leads me to think that you may be connected with the authors of this book. Please be aware that Wikipedia policies on conflict of interest deprecate people closely connected with subjects from writing about them. Sam Blacketer 09:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Please discuss the addition of your book to the see also section on the article's talk page. You have an obvious conflict of interest, and more than one editor has expressed the concern that it may not be an appropriate link. -Onorem♠Dil 17:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Apologies
Firstly, may I apologise for causing any of you guys a problem with my article, 'Princess Diana: The Evidence'. No offence was meant.

I am, however, baffled by your decision to remove the book name 'Princess Diana: The Evidence' from the 'see also' and/or 'further reading' and/or 'external links' sections. While I can understand your 'conflict of interest' point of view with regard to the article (or at least parts of it) I find it hard to understand why you will not allow me to post the name of the book. Other books do not seem to be receiving the same treatment?? I have posted this same message on the article's talk page as requested. Paperbackrighter 18:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Princess Diana: The Evidence
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Princess Diana: The Evidence meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Diana: The Evidence. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. -- Jreferee    t / c  14:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)