User talk:Papersurfer

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your new article Micro novel. However, I'm concerned that it doesn't meet our notability standard (there are only allowed to be articles on subjects which have been written about in several reliable sources). Would you mind if I move your article to a temporary page within your userspace (say User:Papersurfer/Micro novel) where you can work on it and try to get it up to scratch? :) Thanks, and if you ever need any advice, don't hesitate to ask! ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  hemicycle  ─╢ 16:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC) If you give me a few more hours it'll be there - trying to work on a gazillion things right now. Feel free to move it if you wish... Papersurfer (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your work. I'm still not convinced that the page is notable: the topic could potentially be, but none of the sources you listed use the term "micro novel" as far as I can tell, and Wikipedia tries not to host articles about neologisms. It's your choice, of course, but I'd leave it until it can be more substantively referenced, otherwise it might be nominated for deletion. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  co-prince  ─╢ 08:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Microblogging novel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microblogging novel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Microblogging novel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)