User talk:Papuass

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 18:58, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion
I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Always Believe.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "it seems to be copyright violation". However, "it seems to be copyright violation" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:PUI if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 11:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that you tagged the page Image:BristolCity H.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "it seems to be copyright violation". However, "it seems to be copyright violation" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:PUI if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 11:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Enoch Showunmi.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "it seems to be copyright violation". However, "it seems to be copyright violation" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:PUI if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 11:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Latvian Cup
Do you know maybe anything about this year's edition of Latvian Cup? Last year it was held in the first half of the year and now there are no information about it at all, and it is already May. Thanks a lot, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 12:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There was a format change. It will be held this autumn with final part in next spring and winner will play in Eurocups next summer. But there is no more information about it in Latvian media or LFF website. --Papuass (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks a lot. Also, is that change for this season only or the same fall/spring format will be used in the future? I'm asking this because of Template:2008–09 in European Football (UEFA), Template:2009–10 in European Football (UEFA) and so on that need to be changed. SonjiCeli (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You can not be sure about anyting :) It seems that they want to use that in future, too, but no references for that. --Papuass (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

So here it is: first 2 rounds will be played this autumn with 2nd and 3rd level team playing. Next spring Virslīga teams will join them in 1/8-finals. . --Papuass (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Tiebreakers in Latvia
Sorry to bother you again, but I just wanted to ask you one question about the tiebreakers in Virsliga when teams have the same amount of points. So, here's what I saw on official page:

1. labāks rādītājs savstarpējās spēlēs (punkti, vārtu starpība) 2. vairāk uzvaru visās spēlēs 3. labāka iegūto un zaudēto vārtu starpība visās spēlēs 4. lielāks vārtu guvums visās spēlēs 5. labāka iegūto un zaudēto vārtu attiecība visās spēlēs

As I could understand from Google translator, this is what it means:

1. head-to-head results among the teams in question (points, goal difference) 2. number of overall victories 3. better overall goal difference 4. more goals scored 5. ???

Please correct me if I'm wrong and could you tell me what does the fifth one mean so I could apply them. Thnks, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1-4 is correct. 5 means better overall goal ratio. I find it strange, as it does not make sense, but I also found it in official document here . --Papuass (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe it's something like "matches played", because it's not the same if you divide the same goal difference and same goals scored numbers by two different numbers that represent played matches. However, it does not make sense because eventually they will all have the same number of played matches. Therefore, I'll probably not include it.


 * Anyway, thanks for help. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 20:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Papuass. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andžs Flaksis


The article Andžs Flaksis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 18:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Contributions-search
Hello Papuass, I have a question re your contributions-search tool. Could you send me an email? -- Sonic Y (talk) 23:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you be more specific? Send me an email through Wikipedia. --Papuass (talk) 07:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There's no "Email this user" function in your Tools sidebar. Basically, I'm looking for a tool similar to edit summary search but different in that I don't want to look through one user's history but I want to find all users who use a distinctive phrase in their edit summaries. Do you know of a tool like that and how does the contributions-search tool work? When I click on contributions-summary all I get is the message "it works". -- Sonic Y (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately my tool is not in working state and I do not plant to work on it in near future, I might have to remove it from toolserver. --Papuass (talk) 08:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Geocaching
Am not such an avid geocacher. But I have a travel cache with me from Germany that wants to see Niagara Falls. Perhaps we could hide it here in Montreal. Wuselig (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Wuselig (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

For quicker reply, I will email is rainerhalama@aol.com Wuselig (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Wuselig (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Search
Hello,

It was suggested that I contact you.

Would it be possible to make a tool to search all edit summaries? I want to search for examples of IAR being applied correctly. There's this, but it's limited to just one user at a time.

Thanks,

Benjamin (talk) 03:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi!, you could try to use Quarry to query Wikipedia databases once you have familiriazed yourself with database structure. --Papuass (talk) 10:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear Papuass,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:00, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi , you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page. Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly! María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC) If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI , I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users. Thanks and see you around online, María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC) If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft move
Hi, please don't move unreferenced drafts into the main space, like you did Draft:Tutas lietas. It wasn't ready to be published yet; therefore I've moved it back to drafts. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * OK, a novice user asked for help. I have not followed the current procedures of enwiki as I am more active in other places. I have instructed the user to add references. Papuass (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)