User talk:ParadigmShifter1981

ParadigmShifter1981, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * First, no new account quotes WP:BOOSTER in their first edit and second, you are the same account as User:Programmermait.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Ponyo Sir, As for the first point mentioned by you, it is wrong to infer that a new account cannot use WP:BOOSTER on their first edit.Secondly, I have lost my access to the registered email id of User:Programmermait, Being a new user I was unaware of the fact that a user cannot operate two accounts I sincerely apologise for it. But I still don't understand why have you imposed an indefinite block on my account for this mistake also you mentioned that I am a paid editor which I am not. I was trying to make Wikipedia articles better and I have not violated any guidelines in it. I request you to reduce the period of my block. Thanks for bringing this to my notice.
 * "...it is wrong to infer that a new account cannot use WP:BOOSTER on their first edit". No, it's not. It's basic common sense. Admins and checkusers don't check their brain at the door when they log in. Also, "I have lost my access to the registered email id of User:Programmermait" makes no sense since you were editing interchangeably with the account here. Using good hand/band hand accounts to create UPE articles and then "clean" them in an attempt to give the article credibility is so incredibly common and the edit history of Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology is textbook paid editing. I will not be responding further unless a reviewing admin has specific questions. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I respect your decision. But I want to clear that I am not by any means paid by anyone.The concept of paid Wikipedia article editing is really shocking because I use Wikipedia to collect information about different topics myself. I further request you to reduce my account block period, if possible.