User talk:Paradiseisalibrary

Welcome Paradiseisalibrary! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello Paradiseisalibrary. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Mathglot, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Mathglot (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mathglot&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Editing and Verifiability
Hi, Paradiseisalibrary,

Thanks for your edits to Chicano. Wikipedia has plenty of policies and guidelines to guide us when editing, but it will take a while to get on board with them. However, one of the core principles of Wikipedia is that of Verifiability. If there's one policy you need to know at the outset, it is this one. As Wikipedia editors, are role is not to write about what we already know (or think we know), but to find reliable sources about a topic (books, academic journals, newspapers, certain magazines, some websites) and back up everything we say in the article, by adding citations (also known as references or Footnotes) to those sources inline in the article, right after the added material. Each new "fact" added to the article, should have a reference someplace, usually right afterward.

I can see from these four edits to the Chicano article, that you are attempting to improve the article in good faith. That's great, thank you! But there's a missing piece: you didn't add any citations. Can you please go back to the Chicano article, and do the following: Can you do that?
 * do some research in libraries or online to find reliable sources to back up everything you added
 * learn how to create citations, and create some, for each of your additions (see Help:Footnotes, and the templates cite book, cite magazine, cite news}, and cite web)
 * Edit Chicano again, and place the citations you created into the article, right after each chunk of text you added last time.

Please note that anything that is freely editable by the public is not considered a reliable source; since that includes Wiktionary and Wikipedia, these may not be used to back up material you add to another article, per WP:WINARS. If you want to copy sourced (i.e., footnoted) material from another Wikipedia (or Wiktionary) article, it's possible: see WP:CWW and follow the instructions there. Pay particular attention to the suggested text for the edit summary field in that case, in order to fulfill Wikipedia's licensing requirements.)

If you need help in any part of this, please feel free to ask me below (in that case, add to your message) or ask me on my Talk page. Thanks, and again: welcome! Mathglot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi again, Paradiseisalibrary. So I assume you must have seen the messages above, because you've been active since then. However, you still went ahead and made further changes at the article, even if minor ones, without taking care of the sourcing issue.  Since verifiability was still not satsified, I backed out your five changes from the article.  But don't worry: nothing is lost; it's still all there.  You can recover the text from any past version, by going to the History tab. You can copy the text from your old version, find some reliable sources that support it, write a citation or two, and then reinsert your content along with the citations into the article.  Feel free to ping me below, or on my Talk page, if you have any questions.  Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)