User talk:ParadoxEntertainmentCA

December 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Widr (talk) 09:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

A few notes
As you have discovered, Wikipedia does not allow companies to be users - you will need to create different user names for each individual that wants to edit Wikipedia. These user names should not be associated with any company and you need to declare if you are a paid contributor, per WP:DISCLOSEPAY.

Not only that, you also need to read up on our core content policies: neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research - see WP:CCPOL. That boils down to: don't write or edit an article of your place of work.

Furthermore, article subjects must be notable - see WP:NN. If you can't find reliable secondary sources covering your company, that is a big indicator there are no grounds for a Wikipedia article.

Finally, Paradox Entertainment is an existing company name already. If you manage to comply with all our policies to create an article on Paradox Entertainment Ltd Canada that likely still merits a disambiguation page (see H:DIS); that is, do not just "hijack" existing pages for new content.

All in all, I recommend you do nothing and instead await neutral editors to create the article for you - which they will if your company is notable in its own right. That such an article doesn't already exist could mean it simply has no place on Wikipedia - Wikipedia is not a means for promotion, after all. Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 11:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)