User talk:Paramon22

January 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page B-theory of time has been reverted. Your edit here to B-theory of time was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://thescipub.com/pdf/pisp.2011.40.49.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Problem of time have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Problem of time was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://thescipub.com/pdf/pisp.2011.40.49.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Theory of value (economics). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: please stop promoting Sergey Aityan's work trough various publications as you have been doing in all your edits. - DVdm (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Theory of value (economics), you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: also, have a look at Wikipedia's policy about wp:edit warring and wp:consensus, as outline in wp:BRD: when a bold edit is reverted, you should go to the article talk page and discuss. Repeatedly redoing your original edit will get you blocked. Furthermore, have a look at wp:Conflict of interest and wp:SPA. - DVdm (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)