User talk:Parcly Taxel/Archive 2

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:17, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Californium
Actually, it is right. All elements up to Cf (possibly also Es, but that is uncertain) are known to occur naturally. Double sharp (talk) 11:58, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Vote for a flagship article
Hello. You haven't yet voted for a flagship article for WP:ELEM. If you want to vote, please do so before the end of March. Thank you, Double sharp (talk) 12:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

GAN of antimony
User:Double sharp recommended that I get you to look over the antimony article on wikipedia; he said you would do a very thorough review of criterion 1A. Would you be willing to do this? StringTheory11 02:42, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've finished fixing all the points you've mentioned. Double sharp (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

STOP.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Müdigkeit (talk) 04:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Keep April Fools Day out of mainspace!--Müdigkeit (talk) 04:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * For what its worth, I think it was funny.VR talk  03:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Compounds of berkelium GA review
Hello. I've addressed your remaining concerns for 1a and 1b. Double sharp (talk) 07:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

"Transperiodic highway"
We just need polonium to become a GA (it's now at B+) and the transperiodic highway will be complete. Double sharp (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Origin and usage of the term metalloid or Arsenic
Would you mind GA reviewing one of these articles? They have been sitting unreviewed for quite some time now. It would really help WP:ELEM if you reviewed one. StringTheory11 03:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Yellow, blue?
Why did yo change yellow-C into blue-FA without even an explaining es? -DePiep (talk)
 * I am red-green colour blind, and the green (B) and yellow (C) used for the article quality scale look too similar; I have to strain my eyes a bit to distinguish between them. I changed the yellow to blue to make it easier to tell the "to do" articles apart from the completely fixed ones. Princess   Parcly   Taxel  02:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine & fair. Me too. Realy this heavy? Please use es. It is a talk thing anyway, not an article. But hey, I've met a lot of color discussions, especially with wp:elements. We'll meet again. -DePiep (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Something is wrong in our cooperation. I think I was fair earlier, on topic then. How about you? -DePiep (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Deleting good names
Please do not delete correct author names like you did in boron. Names not shown are still read by external data machines like COinS. Please restore them. -DePiep (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

Million Award
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

those hidden Easter eggs
This (reference 23) may seem funny, but it's not to everyone. (And it's hard to hunt through and find them.) Could I ask you to not do it? Double sharp (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Memristor Graphic
Can you please see my comments on your talk page? Thanks. :) Jarod (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Metalloid
I noticed all your recent edits to the article on Metalloid. Because I know they were all done in a sincere effort to improve the article, and because you have been editing in Wikipedia for a while, I will not undo them all in one wholesale revert. However, in the future, your fellow editors would appreciate it if you would make just a few edits at a time, then save them before proceeding to the next section. This way, if another editor feels that one or two edits need to be undone, this can be done without undoing all the rest. I'm not going to change any of your edits; I'm leaving the reviewing to another editor. Best regards, CorinneSD (talk) 23:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Parcly Taxel. Your input is requested at the end of metalloid FAC thank you. Sandbh (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fluorine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraffin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Neptunium GAN
I fixed everything you pointed out. Double sharp (talk) 07:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Check your mail
--R8R (talk) 23:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't receive it. Forgot to update my e-mail. Resend it now and I should be able to receive it. Parcly   Taxel  00:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Take more care
This edit re editor Double sharp may be crossing a line. "I know where you're coming from" can be read as a threat, and as a non-constructive attitude. Of course I could misunderstand you (recently I wrote about the angle of your writing, re me), but maybe that's another reason to change the tone of your music. On a minor level, but just a bit minor and still seriously, I note that you are talking for another editor (Nergaal). AFAIK, that editor is fully able to talk & sign themselves. -DePiep (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Come on, don't hurry, FAC is not a very fast procedure
But an FAC is also not a process which will be forgotten for too long (now you certainly know FAC coordinators exist). We should be able to make it.--R8R (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * there have been no promotions or archivals in the last 3 days. An empirical observation from me – are they having a break or what? Parcly   Taxel  01:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries. Three days isn't a too long period. A week, yes, that would be different. But there are only three coordinators, and Wikipedia is not their full-time job they get money for, and they may be having issues IRL, or they may want to make a short rest for a few days, or anything. Be slightly more patient. Three days more, three days less. That's not too bad. Again, a week, yes, that's when you should be conspicuous. But I'll tell you what, a FAC lasting a month is okay. I am slightly surprised we possibly can finish earlier.--R8R (talk) 01:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Nice .svg file
Just stating I find it good. For real.--R8R (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

When you get a chance...
I've been intermittently following some of the discussions at WPELEM, and was glad to see that you returned. Formalities aside, whenever you get a chance, would you be willing to perform a GA review for Serpens, which has now been stuck at GAN for over a month? I would greatly appreciate it, but if you don't want to, that's fine too. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)