User talk:Paribrajak

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Paribrajak, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Brahmabandhav Upadhyay have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Madhuri Chattopadhyay) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Madhuri Chattopadhyay, Paribrajak!

Wikipedia editor Chandan Guha just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for the article. Some more information would be helpful. Please check copyrights for pix before you upload them."

To reply, leave a comment on Chandan Guha's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chandan Guha (talk) 03:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Image
How do you own the copyright of this image? --Titodutta (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Chinmoy Lahiri) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Chinmoy Lahiri.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to K. C. Dey, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santu Mukherjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Santu_Mukherjee check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Santu_Mukherjee?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Good Article
I've seen that you put a Good Article batch at the top of your article GhanaDa. Which articles are counted as Good Articles is determined by a third-party review. Only if an article has been so reviewed can this batch be placed on it (typically by a bot). Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 12:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ghanada


The article Ghanada has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A non-notable fiction character with no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ghanada for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghanada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ghanada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 07:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Grave yard of Gupta familily at Kaoradi.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grave yard of Gupta familily at Kaoradi.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:GhanaDa series
I have nominated Category:GhanaDa series for speedy renaming to Category:Ghanada short stories. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)