User talk:Parishan/Archive 2009

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. VartanM (talk) 06:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

David Bek's rebelion against Iran
Hi I wrote something on David bek's talk page: Guys let's see it this way. I do not know what kiesling says. But it is certainly true that david bek fought against the Iranian rule in Zangaezur. As Iran was associated with the Shia Muslim Turkic people in Zangezur it is very probable that this population was targetted. It is very opportunistic to claim to fight Safavid rule, when the Safavid Iran was invaded by Afghans and Ottoman Turks. This sheds some line in whose camp he initally fought. Shia Musliems were an enemy of the Ottomans (and Afghans) and traditionally favored by the Safavids. No offense intended though. I know David bek is a national hero in Armenia, no offense but these facts are facts. History is history. Just be sincere about it and let it be as it is --Babakexorramdin (talk) 22:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

my answer
you know who those authors are. Please do not divert the subject. And living in Canada does not mean that you are not from the republic of Azerbaijan. i know that you are not a Turkic Azeri, but that aside. You cannot claim that ethnic minorities are not discriminated against in the Republic of Azerbaijan. All reports confirm that. No offense, but I just wanted to tell you and the Armenian editor that neither Armenia nor republic of Azerbaijan is a perfect place for the minorities.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I wont reveal your identity in wikipedia. I am a man of ettiquettes. However I apprecaite that you also try to teach some IPs that they reffrain from fool language at my user talk. I know that they cannot turn down your advise. So please tell them it is not good for them to get troubles with the Iranian Azeris like me.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

About /ə/ in Juhuri
Hi Parishan

You're right, there is a phoneme distinct from /i/ represented by 'и'. I should have looked at your source before reverting.

However, I don't think it's /ə/. The source describes only its backness, but not its height. I don't think the height is mid. It sounds more like a near-close vowel. Of course, I don't have any sources to back this up, so my assessment amounts to no more than OR.

Your thoughts? Juhur (talk) 00:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it's probably near-close central unrounded vowel. It can't be close because that happens to be the Russian 'ы' and the source says that it's not the same as 'ы'. Juhur (talk) 14:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
Disagreeing with you is not 'obvious vandalism'. That is something like blanking an article, or inserting genitalia into an article. Please don't abuse the term. --Golbez (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw it; but assuming good faith, I took it to be he had hit undo (as everyone else in the fight had been doing) and took out a legitimate edit along with the map. If you were looking only as that as the 'clear case of vandalism', then by that right, you should have only restored that image, unless you consider switching the map as a 'clear case vandalism' (it isn't). I would have fixed it myself, but I've decided not to edit the article itself, since I feel strongly enough about the different maps that I couldn't feel neutral in the matter. --Golbez (talk) 00:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Села
Я переименовываю в доконфликтные названия, село называлось Азох, а не Azikh, смотрите доконфликтые карты.Gragg (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Сел Ванк много, я помню 4 доконфликтных Ванк. Соотвественно привязку Нагорный Карабах нельзя использовать, но я использовал привязку по райну АзССР (Мардакетский, а не Мартакерский) Если хотите уточните в скобках по координатам. Ок? Gragg (talk) 19:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Каракенд действительно Каракенд. Gragg (talk) 19:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Info
Hei, do you have an email so I can contact you?

Mamedyarov/Mammadyarov
Hi there, I just wondered if you could explain this move and what views you have sought from other editors. As far as I am aware, the former is the popular version used in English texts and is also the officially recognised form of his name used by FIDE. Consequently, I am slightly confused as to why it has changed. Thanks for your time. Brittle heaven (talk) 21:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks, that's very clear. We are not unfamiliar with the whole transliteration (via Russian) issue here on the chess pages and it often causes controversy and/or divides opinion. Personally, I believe in using the popular English version, in other words the version that most English speakers would type into Google and I take my lead from the policy stated at WP:Naming conventions (common names). I have raised my concern at Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Chess and will certainly abide by the majority verdict there, should anyone wish to comment. Please feel free to post your point of view, as I wouldn't want any discussion to be one-sided. Thanks again. Brittle heaven (talk) 23:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Information about discretionary sanctions
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Armenia-Azerbaijan, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad discretionary sanctions, described here and below.


 * Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. PhilKnight (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Editing advice
Wikipedia works by building consensus. This is done through the use of polite discussion—involving the wider community, if necessary—and dispute resolution, rather than through disruptive editing. Editors are each responsible for noticing when a debate is escalating into an edit war, and for helping the debate move to better approaches by discussing their differences rationally. Edit-warring, whether by reversion or otherwise, is prohibited; this is so even when the disputed content is clearly problematic, with only a few exceptions such as dealing with vandalism, or libelous material. Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. PhilKnight (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Sunnis of the Eastern Caucasus
Parishan. Are you sure the source is right? As far as I know the Daghestanis are Shafii and Kurds were Shafiis too. It is believed that western Iran was Shafeii too. It is the first wave of islamization. The Hanafis were the next wave and spead an east to west axis, from Afghanistan into the Balkans. Then the Shias spread from the Iranian Azerbaijan to all over Iran. As I have read (but I dont know for sure) there are still some villages in the Iranian talysh who are Shafii too. By the way what are the Sunni Tats? I mean those who live in the North of the republic of Azerbaijan?--Babakexorramdin (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So in this case the southern Lezgins are Hanafi? How about Ingiloys? About Meskhetians I know they are Hanafi, because they were islamized by the Ottomans--Babakexorramdin (talk) 10:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Parishan you said that in Quba and Shaki they are Hanafi. Yet these are places inhabited by Lezgic tribes, many of which are Turkified. What I want to know is how the hanafication has taken place? And are you sure about the Ingiloy? Because Adjarians and Meskhetians are surely Hanafi but I hear mixed things about the Ingiloys, many sources say they are Shia due to Persian-Azeri influence and many other say they are Sunni due to Daghestani (Avar) influence. In that case it is more likely that they are Hanafi.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 11:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

AE
Please take a look at at the following report: .--  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 23:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Winners of Women's Soviet Championships
Hello Parishan, I'm an italian chessplayer, not strong over the board but very fond of chess history. On the italian wikipedia (Utente:Gab.pr) I made close to 300 chess biographies (many translated from other wikis). Reading the article on Tatiana Zatulovskaya, that I presume you wrote, I see that you included the three USSR championships she won. I'm trying for some time to find a complete list of winners of the women soviet championship, but could not find it antwhere, though I have a lot of chess books. I'm asking you where you found those data and if you have the list of winners of all championships (from 1927 when they started to 1991 when they ended). With that material I will be able to write a page on this championship on it.wikipedia and maybe also on en.wikipedia. Thank you and compliments for your work, --Gabodon (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:Zatulovskaya
Thank you all the same for answering and good work. Greetings, --Gabodon (talk) 06:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Good Work
Nice articles man. Keep up the good work!--NovaSkola (talk) 04:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Source on Armenians in AZ
Parishan, The article you cite is at best outdated. The numbers are from 1998. Serouj (talk) 06:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:AE
Hi, please be aware of this report: - Fedayee (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Parishan, as a result of that request (permanent link), under the authority of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, you are sanctioned as follows: For six months, you are prohibited from making more than one revert per page per seven-day-period with respect to any page related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, broadly construed, with the exception of reverting obvious vandalism. Violations of this restriction may result in blocks and additional sanctions.  Sandstein  15:40, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Sport in Azerbaijan
Sorry to bother you again but I really need your help to improve article Sport in Azerbaijan as it involves lots of effort.--NovaSkola (talk) 07:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sona Babai


The article Sona Babai has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability beyond one event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cheers, CP 16:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Sona Babai
I have nominated Sona Babai, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sona Babai. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cheers, CP 17:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)