User talk:Parlebourbon3

Hi Everyone! Welcome to my TalkPage. Feel free to leave comments and suggestions.

P.S.: Any abuse or vandalism on my talk page shall not e tolerated.

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Rahul Roushan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 13:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Removing repetitive material which doesn't seem to be repetitive and could be seen as white-washing
I see that you removed "a right-wing news portal that has published fake news." from the lead of Rahul Roushan - in fact it should be repeated there as the WP:LEAD is a summary of the main aspects of the article. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be suspected of white-washing the article, so I hope you will restore it. You also removed the following:


 * In November 2018, he became the CEO of a spin-off digital media startup – Aadhyaasi Media & Content Services, which took over the production of OpIndia from Swarajya. Ideologically oriented towards right-wing populism, OpIndia claims to be a fact-checking website, but has published fake news on multiple occasions. In May 2019, the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), an affiliate of the Poynter Institute, rejected its application to be accredited as a fact checker. "

I can't see where that was repeated - please explain this as I'm puzzled. And what were the grammar changes? Also, why did you remove the additional references in the hidden comment?

Even more mysteriously, after an automated script called a 'bot' removed a protection template because the article was no longer protected, you replaced it twice.

This is all a bit concerning. Please do note the alert above. Doug Weller talk 13:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller Ok, I won't do this again. But I want you to visit the Wire India's website once. And see if it any one, even one thing good about the right wing is there. Or leave this. Just see if there is any item that does not criticise the right wing. ALso see whether the site has a separate section for communalism or not. ALso see if the website is highly critical of the present goc=vernment of India. Now see the article's wikipedia page. You will find two different things.

The Indian right wing media is actually quite crazy and does insensible reporting, as you mentioned with OpIndia. Due to this, it frequently becomes unreliable. However what you seem to miss because of all this is that the left wing media gets whitewashed automatically. Indian Media is predominantly left wing. And there is no problem in that. The problem arises when the same media calls the right wing media biased, attacks there journalists not on wiki, not on their site, but rather publicly on twitter. ANd the same left media claims that it is unbiased. ANd publishes articles against right wing media. ANd these articles get cited on wiki. And thus wiki gets biased. WHich I do not want, and which is not in compliance with wiki's policy. I just want to Improve these articles.

And one more thing about whitewashing: I will never make an attempt to whitewash someone's image on wiki. I always try to Improve the article, so that the person reading the article, does not get prejudiced from the start.

Then let us talk about me deleting claims about OpIndia's rejection. True, it reports fake news. True, nearly every new forum does it. True, Opindia does it more. But do we need to add the description of organisation everytime, we wrtite about its CEO? No! That's what linking is for. If a person wants to see what kind of website OpIndia is, He will simply click the OpIndia link within Rahul Roushan's article. There is no need for a mention again on its CEO's page.

That's all what I want to say. Hope you will look into it. Sorry if I offended you, although I have written this piece with utmost patience. Parlebourbon3 (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Your recent editing history at Rahul Rushan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You need to know this. Doug Weller  talk 15:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Doug! Just to let you know, my last edit on that page was solely to comply to your demand, i.e. add right wing news forum to OpIndia's name, which I had deleted. I am not engaging or trying to engage in an edit war, and refrain from doing any such actions. Parlebourbon3 (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Linking to your previous account
Hi Parlebourbon3, since this is a new account created when your old one was compromised, you should post a notice on your user page (and to the user page of your previous account) that links the two accounts together. More information on this here: ''If you are unable to access your account because you have lost the password or because someone has obtained or guessed your password, you may create a new account with a clean password. In such a case, you should post a note on the user page of each account indicating that they are alternative accounts for the same person. Regards, --bonadea'' contributions talk 18:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Noted and posted. Thanks for reminding. Parlebourbon3 (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Copy-and-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Hany Babu a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hany babu. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you.

I've moved the first version to Draft:Hany Babu/1 and the second version to Draft:Hany Babu/2 and requested a history merge of the two into one version which can then be properly reviewed and/or moved back into mainspace. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Canvassing
Hi Parlebourbon. I'm Barkeep49, an editor and administrator here. I notice you've gone to a few different user talks (e.g. 1, 2 asking to be pinged if users need support in the future. This could end up being a form of tag teaming and is best avoided. Instead you can use your watchlist to find articles/discussions of interest where you might want to weigh in. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I apologize for that. Parlebourbon3 (talk) 05:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to OpIndia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hindutva, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   Eumat114 (Message) 07:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

I have left wikipedia
I have left wikipedia, someone is using my account. Kindly block this. Any new edits are not done by me. Parlebourbon3 (talk) 07:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Vanamonde (Talk) 14:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hany Babu (October 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hany Babu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hany Babu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hany_Babu Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheAafi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hany_Babu reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (talk) 21:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hany Babu


Hello, Parlebourbon3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hany Babu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  11:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)