User talk:Parnashree

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. lTopGunl (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Who is Dr. Sailen Debnath?


The article Who is Dr. Sailen Debnath? has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Sailen Debnath for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sailen Debnath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sailen Debnath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 02:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sailen Debnath. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  21:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Kamtapur. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ''We do not make comments in articles. It's clear you are here to promote Debnath, but he is a minor academic and fails WP:RS. When other academics start to use him as a source, then he may pass our criteria for the work that they refer to. '' Dougweller (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Reply by Parnashree:

Thank you for your comments. I am not to promote Debnath as you have said. The fact is that the history part of Kamatapur in the said talk page was originally composed by me depending on the research of Debnath on Kamatapur, whereas nobody has done it yet; and it is a fact that Dr. Sailen Debnath was the first person to have brought out the history of Kamatapur in his book 'The Dooars in Historical Transition'. You can not find in any other book when Kamatapur actually began as a kingdom, as Debnath has shown. Now keeping my edited part and language intact, someone inserted the name of D. Nath instead of Sailen Debnath simply indicates to plagiarism. D. Nath has not been the person to have told that Kamatapur began in 650 A.D. and Kamatapur had its first capital at Nalrajar Garh and then at Maynaguri, Panchagarh and Gosanimari; it was Sailen Debnath to have pointed out all these. How then one can ignore the fact and write the wrong thing? No one is supposed to take away the credit of a researcher on the ground that he is not a big guy and a small 'academic' in your language. I am so much confirmed of the history of Kamatapur that I request the person to have changed my edited part to produce any other book on Kamatapur with the fact of its history. Please, don't push the issue to High Court.Often, because of media a small man becomes big; and a big man remains unknown. I am aggrieved to see Wikipedia to step in the same line; therefore, I think seriously of bidding it good-bye. 117.201.114.32 (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


 * High Court? You might want to read WP:NLT and make it clear you have no intention of taking legal action or suggesting to anyone that they take legal action. No one inserted D Nath instead of Debnath, D. Nath is Dambarudhar Nath, the author of History of the Koch Kingdom, C. 1515-1615. I don't mean to be rude to Debnath, but Nath looks much more like a reliable source by our criteria. Anyway, before I discuss this any further I need to hear from you about the High Court statement. Dougweller (talk) 15:59, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Reply by Parnashree:

Thank you for having referred to WP:NLT. I do agree to dispute resolution process of Wikipedia. But I can not agree with you on the point that whereas still the part of the history of Kamatapur in the talk-page contains my version and language as I had put it from the chapter named 'THE FOUNDATION OF KAMATAPUR IN THE DOOARS' in the book entitled 'The Dooars in Historical Transition' by Sailen Debnath, then how D. Nath whose book is on the Koch kingdom and not on Kamatapur can be referred to for a fact of history not discussed by him in his book? I have gone through the history book by D. Nath. have you? Anyway, for Wikipedia we have to come to a point of truth and not falsehood. I have further edited Kamatapur talk page in order to give reference to the book of Sailen Debnath; and that in the moderate way not mentioning his name in the body of the article but only in the reference part.I am sure, it is not any body other but only Sailen Debnath to have written this part of the history of Kamatapur. If you still remove it, that act will be accountable for copy right violation; because nobody has told about the capitals of Kamatapur and its beginning in 650 A.D. except Sailen Debnath.Parnashree (talk) 16:25, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kamtapur, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear Jim, thank you for your advice. Some editors questioned me about the references given to the books of Sailen Debnath, though he is the only authority on the history of Kamtapur. The portion that has been deleted once was inserted by me; but as two editors continuously criticized me for the previous edition and doubted my academic honesty, in order to avoid dispute, I took the talk page on Kamtapur to its pre-edition stage by deleting the facts inserted from the books of Sailen Debnath. I have been very much sorry for all that criticism against me. For this reason I shall soon bid Wikipedia good-bye.


 * Quotation removed as requested. Dougweller (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)