User talk:Parny wallace

November 2016
Hello, I'm Ronaz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grafton saxophone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  ron az Talk!  18:02, 10 November 2016 (UT

Thank you for finally providing a reason for the first delete, However the purpose for Wikipedia is correct information. I feel that I can and have provided important information as given to me by hector and seconded by a third party. I am willing to have the information edited but not deleted. Please send me back what you feel may be appropriate. I appreciate that you have provided a fairly good History of this created product.

Faithfully P Wallace

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Didym (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Omega Lighting


A tag has been placed on Draft:Omega Lighting, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It is a rejected submission at Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)