User talk:Parousie

Welcome!

Hello, Parousie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Nicola Berwick


The article Nicola Berwick has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 10:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
A tag has been placed on Lincoln (2012 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. TeleComNasSprVen (talk &bull; contribs) 16:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

AN/I
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Parousie. Thank you.

Lincoln (2012 film)
Please do not recreate "Lincoln (2012 film)" as an article, without showing significant coverage in reliable sources.

Per the discussion, it should be a redirect until reliable sources can be demonstrated.

You may wish to write a user-space draft, and ask for it to be checked out before making it live.

But please do not change the redirect again, without verification. Thanks.  Chzz  ► 23:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Reg Traviss


The article Reg Traviss has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication that this person is independently notable, does not inherit notability from Winehouse

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.. Yes, I am aware that you have been blocked as a WP:SOCK, but in my opinion blocked accounts still deserve courtesy. I'll pop a message about this on the sockmaster talkpage as well.--Shirt58 (talk) 12:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)