User talk:Parrot of Doom/Archives/2016/March

Today's featured article/March 21, 2016
If you didn't do such good work, we wouldn't have to put it on the Main Page, but there you are. How does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 16:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, I made some changes, not too major, hope you don't mind. I'll probably have to go over the article to check everything still works and that anything untoward hasn't been added, but I can't guarantee I'll be around to look over it on the 21st. Parrot of Doom 23:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, good job. - Dank (push to talk) 02:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Regarding your edits today, "subsequently" never works for me on WP, because WPians don't agree on what it means ... soon, later, and consequently are some of the assigned meanings. - Dank (push to talk) 13:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The OED is pretty clear - "Following in order or succession; coming or placed after something expressed or implied." Parrot of Doom 14:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's just Americans who don't understand what "subsequently" means? Eric   Corbett  15:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm American, and I know what it means, which is what the OED says, but I think sometimes the word "later" can be a pretty close synonym ("coming...after something"); sometimes "subsequently" is just the right word. – Corinne (talk) 02:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)