User talk:Parsonrl/sandbox

Peer Review
In this reading about animal suicide, I would like to recommend a few suggestions. The sentence structure of some of the information [prtraied in this piece is out of place. Certain sentences are just repeating itself to make it seem more important; this causes the article to appear to be poorly written. Some information seems to be thrown in there just for the sake of having an example. The examples are fine, but perhaps you can try working with the flow of the paragraphs rather than just have facts spilled onto a paragraph and hope it makes sense. On the Misconception heading, the information seems too specific to be considered a misconception. Misconception should be about animal suicide, not a specific instance of the misconception. Perhaps change the heading of the title to fit the discription more appropriately. Other than that, the article is sound in being neutral. No biased is shown and the information is being presented in a way that can be comprehended. Besides the few hiccups, this article is acceptable to be posted on Wikipedia.

````