User talk:Parundell

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale
You asked why Wikipedia cannot have a page about you when it does on other astrologers. Please take a look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people and its general notability guidelines and tell us which one(s) of those criteria you meet. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Spamming and self-aggrandizement
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  16:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Your article
After a great deal of effort I persuaded the deleting admin to undelete your article Patrick Arundell. Lord alone knows why I did this, it is a terrible article. Please do not make this a complete waste of time: provide references for some of the more notable of the 200 claimed media publications. Wikipedia requires verifiability, if you do not do this it will probably get deleted again and this time for good.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  18:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patrick Arundell


The article Patrick Arundell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; 141.156.161.245 (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Even though I saved your article from deletion, I am going to delete it myself if you don't do some work on it soon. I saved it to give you a chance to provide some references, not to so it could stay there forever with unverified claims.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  21:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)