User talk:Parvati4shiva

The article Sacred Spot Massage has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sacred Spot Massage


The article Sacred Spot Massage has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no assertion of notability. Books about tantra generally do not indicate notability, neither do non WP:RS podcasts found on google.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello. If you genuinely believe that there should be an article on this subject, you are welcome to make your case on my talk page. However, without any reliable sources covering the subject, Wikipedia is not able to have an article. J Milburn (talk) 00:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)