User talk:Parveenrabbi

September 2020
Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Current affairs have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Current affairs. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 09:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Current affairs. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Bruce1eetalk 11:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Current affairs
Why blocking? I am not understand plz tell me Parveenrabbi (talk) 11:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)