User talk:Pasa1899

Welcome!
Hello, I'm PatGallacher. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eric Joyce without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PatGallacher (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Felida97. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bola Tinubu—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Felida97 (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bola Tinubu, you may be blocked from editing. Felida97 (talk) 16:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Bola Tinubu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

I only published the truth. The man in question is running for President and the people need to know who he is. A very bad guy, nothing about him on the internet is true. Pasa1899 (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Bola Tinubu. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Brymo. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Skipple  ☎  14:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brymo.  Skipple  ☎  20:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Egusi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, please discuss it with the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Egusi, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You have been warned/blocked numerous times for adding unsourced material. You will be blocked if you do it again. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Egusi.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)