User talk:Pasananpages

"Selected Emotions for Her"
A tag has been placed on "Selected Emotions for Her", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of "Selected Emotions for Her" and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 21:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Darren. R. Jones
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darren. R. Jones, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Author of two self published books. Doesn't meet notability standards for WP. No reliable secondary sources readily identifiable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Unusual? Quite TalkQu  22:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of "The Sound of a Breakdown"
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article "The Sound of a Breakdown", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non notable self published book

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Unusual? Quite TalkQu  22:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I've replied to you
On the article talk pages. To summarise: : You should look at the Wikipedia policies related to reliable sources, notability and conflict of interest. An author of self published books with no articles about them in reliable sources will generally fail Wikipedia's notability test. I guess you are in fact the subject of these articles. Although writing about yourself or your work is not banned, it can create a conflict of interest and tends to make articles look more like adverts. The best idea is to wait for another editor to write about you / your work. Whether you are or are not the author, what you need to do is provide references from reliable web sites or print media that show this person is notable in an encyclopedic way Unusual? Quite  TalkQu  22:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)