User talk:Pascal.Tesson/Archive 17

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Myscarygirl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Myscarygirl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Stephen Kaplan
All the copyrighted material used was with permission of the authors. I personally kniow Troy Taylor of prairieghosts.com. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vwjr (talk • contribs) 20:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:31107 at Derby.jpg
Regarding this edit which I presume is you. I've discussed User:ACBest/Credit with the user in question explaining that it is possible to specify the means of attribution required without this which duplicates much of Attribution. Having highlighted how I've formatted this very image the user has not objected to this approach. Adambro (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

DJ F-Bod
FYI: You just deleted this article and user recreated it. -- ALLSTAR  echo 08:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, User:Jmlk17 just deleted it again. -- ALLSTAR  echo 08:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Bloody Hell
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Bloody Hell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ciaobelli.com: Page deletion
Good evening,

I am just wondering why you deleted the Ciaobelli page I created. You've defined it "blatant advertising" so I am asking you what's the difference between the content of that page and those of other social networks on Wikipedia?

Looking forward for an immediate reply,

Andrea D'Ottavio Founding Partner, Ciaobelli.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea07016 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

GAC
I was wondering if you could look over History of Davenport, Iowa and see if it is ready to be a GAC yet, if not, what I need to do to improve it C t j f 8 3 talk 19:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back
I noticed that you had been offline for sometime, and that you've now started editing again. Welcome back, Pascal.Tesson! :) Acalamari 22:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Roman Catholic dioceses of Great Britain
This category was emptied and trashed. I am restoring it back to where it was. Up until 4 days ago it had stayed just the same and was very useful. Benkenobi18 (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

FlowerPetal.Com
This article was underconstruction as the guidelines indicated. Seems like someone would have offered up a more constructive talk, then to speedily delete. I followed the same format as other company articles have done. Please advise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marky36 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Just for fun

 * P.T, I have been impressed with your comments in recent WikiDiscussions and had the thought to ask if I might enlist your assistance - both as an editor and as an admin perspective - in a few (future?) WikiEssays that I have begun or conceived. I value others' views and think that you would be a great help to them. A couple literally need complete writing and a couple have been started. Anyway, feel free to take a look and if you're interested and able to contribute, please do! I would appreciate the help! It's just for fun, if you have the time and the inkling. The essays are:
 * Create Your Own Cabal — 
 * Don't Assume Good Faith — 
 * Don't Engage In Crusades — 
 * Edit Counts Don't Matter — 
 * Guilty Until Proven Innocent — 
 * WikiPhilia — 
 * Thanks in advance for any help you may provide!   • VigilancePrime    •     •     •   20 18:55 Feb '08
 * Thank you for the invitation, but to be honest, I'm not quite sure why you'd bother writing all of this. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Copypaste is your friend here on Wikipedia... ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
All I will say is thank you :-). ShoesssS Talk 03:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * PS: - By the way – no warning :-). ShoesssS Talk 03:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Although, for the record, you definitely deserved one. But I'm not a big believer in warnings, especially since you seemed fully aware that your last reply was overboard. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Martijn RfA
Hi. In your support for the RfA nomination of User:Martijn Hoekstra you refer to 'diffs presented below by Harland1'. Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't see any diffs presented by Harland1. Could you point me to the relevant pages? Thanks!--RegentsPark (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. Perhaps I should take a second look since we seem to have come to diametrically opposite conclusions.--RegentsPark (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the perspective. I see now that if no well-meaning editor tried to find a reasonable ground in articles such as the pro-pedophilia one, the pedia would be a mess of special interest positions. Thanks!--RegentsPark (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello Pascal, I hope I am doing this correctly. Thank you for the help on my first attempt at a page "Finney Ross". Is there anything else I need to do, or is the editing you did ok as is? Thank you very much! Vintagedirtbiker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vintagedirtbiker (talk • contribs) 18:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Email?
I feel bad about our exchange. You don't have email activated, but if you can ping my email there's something I'd like to mention. Raymond Arritt (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks
 A message from Warthog  Demon.

Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding policy. --Cuddlyable3 (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of "Garden & Weeks Hall"
You deleted the page Garden & Weeks Hall, however I'd like to know how the article can be edited. Other articles about Imperial College London halls of residence are present in Wikipedia, yet have not been deleted: Beit Hall, or Wilson House... (Oh and in case you're wondering, these halls are all non profit. They also do not "market" directly to students - the university is responsible for allocating places in halls of residence to first year students.)

DanielJar (talk) 15:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Heads up
I thought you would like to know that I am citing this event in my upcoming RFA. I address the issue here (question 3). I know it's old and (for me, anyway) painful history, but I'm sure it'll be discussed and I didn't think it would be right if somebody surprised you about it while the RFA was taking place. Hope all is going well in your life -- Shark face  217  01:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks
Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence §  t / e  18:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/WhichWay676676
Thanks for the heads-up here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Red Hot Reiner Peppers
Can this be rolled back? It was deleted under WP:Music A7, yet it's the only Live Midi band I'm aware of in existance, which is what makes it notable simply for being such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pacifictiger (talk • contribs) 18:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

my RFA
Hey thanks for your support. Maybe it's because I haven't finished my coffee yet, but what are these PAW-related articles I am insane to work on? :) Thanks, Van Tucky 17:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. I think I took the userbox off my userspace and quit watching the page. Actually, the constant yammering and bullish behavior of some anti-pedophile crusaders got to be more odious than the one or so actual, real pedophile activists who pop up regularly. They see pedophiles hidden in every shadow, and it got to be intolerable. Van Tucky 20:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Reiner peppers
Hi, can you explain why you left the AFD link as a redlink at Red Hot Reiner Peppers? This doesn't allow people to find the AFD, so I recommend you withdraw the AFD request, then start again with a proper tag with a bluelink and not a redlink. Best, Badagnani (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Mediawiki bug. A null edit solved the problem. While it was a redlink, the redlink did take you to the right debate page and since many have already participated, there's no reason to restart the AfD. It's pretty clear that I shouldn't have undeleted the article in the first place. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 13:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Gallery of country flags
Good call. Thanks. Double Blue (Talk) 03:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)