User talk:Pascale989

Re: List of Dirty Jobs episodes
Re your message: Please see topic on the Talk page of the article for my reasons on why the Episode list should be used instead of your format. If you think the template is ugly, I recommend that you work with the WikiProject Television/Episode coverage group to modify the table to make it look better. As for the broken table, you left the table broken in this revision starting with the Season 1.5 section. -- Gogo Dodo 23:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Per your comment and "warning", please remember to remain civil in your discussions on Wikipedia. Please do not attack other editors.  Wikipedia is built upon consensus and you do not have consensus for your changes per the discussions I pointed out at Talk:List of Dirty Jobs episodes.  I strongly recommend that you join the discussion instead of forking your own copy or articles or reverting changes. -- Gogo Dodo 07:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Modern Marvels episodes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Modern Marvels episodes was changed by Pascale989 (c) (t) deleting 20536 characters on 2007-09-03T10:11:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 14:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Dirty Jobs Episode List
A report about your actions on this page was made at WP:AN/I. You cannot maintain a content fork just because you don't like the way the original page was established. there is consensus there to maintain it the way it is, and wikipedia works by consensus. Should you REALLY feel you have a legitimate case, pursue this at WP:DR, for direct intervention, at WP:3O, for a third opinion, (which this is, by the way), of WP:RfC, where you can list the pages and problem for a group review to establish a wider consensus. However, you're experiencing a 3O right now, RfC will probably back the current page as meeting Wikipedia's manual of style, and DR is for bigger fights, and you may be told to 'suck it up', and help out in better ways. That said, you now have three manners of recourse better than edit warring, which is what you're currently engaged in. I hope this helps you out, and htat you can continue to contribute positively to Wikipedia. ThuranX 14:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)