User talk:Pasqual88

Speedy deletion nomination of Linden optometry


A tag has been placed on Linden optometry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 17:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi, I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the company notability guidelines. Since it appears to have only one branch, it may well not meet the criteria anyway.

It also contained unreferenced promotional claims that need in-line independent references if they are true. A few examples (there are others)
 * A Professional Corporation
 * one of the largest vision care centers in the United States
 * pioneer in medical advertising
 * standard model for most successful health-care practices
 * Linden Optometry quickly became well-known in Southern California for it's [sic] wide array of eyecare services

The article is all about the services provided, nothing about eg turnover. Please see this information

The article lacked any wikilinks, and looked as if it might have been copied from a non-public domain source, such as the company website. I didn't check for this since it failed on the criteria above, but note that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient.

I've never heard of Lenscraft, so please don't question my integrity. I looked at their article. It's very poor, but it does have independent references, and it's been around too long to be speedy deleted.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)