User talk:Passion4Process

Ways to improve Low-code development platforms
Hi, I'm Eyesnore. Passion4Process, thanks for creating Low-code development platforms!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Should you come up with a lead section for this article?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

 Eye snore  19:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appian Corporation (July 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Appian Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  11:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Appian Corporation has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Appian Corporation. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  17:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC Review Accepted
Hi,

I just reviewed your article on Appian Corporation and passed it, due to the additional sources since the last review. I deemed it slightly marginal, and thus not entirely safe from either passing New Page Review or just being submitted to Articles for Deletion. I did some regular tidying up, as well as some extra linking to it, but it could probably use one more good source like Wired's or the WashingtonPost - a key thing to remember is that sources talking about IPOs, or new headquarters, aren't usually accepted as adding to article notability.

In any case, thanks for preserving through the multiple reviews - the military usage news article was an interesting read too Nosebagbear (talk) 19:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Appian Corporation
Hello, Passion4Process,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Appian Corporation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Appian Corporation.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)