User talk:Passionforlanguage

Orphaned non-free media (File:Veritas Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Veritas Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Planet Veritas


The article Planet Veritas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Many of the references are dead links, others barely mention or even don't mention Veritas, including some that merely include the company in a list of winners of various prizes, others look like press releases. The artciel is also largely promotional in tone, and has clearly been substantially written by one or more editors with a conflict of interest.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I agree the page needs updating and substantive editing to remove elements of bias and 'sales speak'. Some parts also seem to have been written by a non-fluent Engish speaker. I am no longer affiliated with this company (in fact, it appears to have been wound up and re-created) and so am not able (or willing) to carry out the editing myself. I suggest that the owner of 'Planet Veritas' is contacted directly.Passionforlanguage (talk) 13:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Veritas Language Solutions


The article Veritas Language Solutions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A prior PROD for the article was declined on the basis that it would be rewritten. The original proposer also noted the poor quality in sources, and that the awards were not particularly prominent.  No new sources have arisen to address these concerns.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I, JethroBT drop me a line 21:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

@I JethroBT I agree that the pages should be deleted, given that the company is now dissolved and the references are all at least a few years old now. It's clearly in the past and irrelevant. Passionforlanguage (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)