User talk:Passivemeaggressiveyou

this is not an encyclopedia
This website is enclopedic, but it is also a repository of all information, hence the term Wiki. Your edits are your opinion, whereas, the purpose of wikipedia is a collection of information (Regushee (talk) 02:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC))
 * No, you fucktard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information --Passivemeaggressiveyou (talk) 02:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. → Σ τ  c. 06:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Frood! Ohai What did I break now? 06:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for egregious personal attacks against other editors. Whatever the dispute, that tone merely inflames the situation and drives people away.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Del Beccaro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Del Beccaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Del Beccaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Duf Sundheim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duf Sundheim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Duf Sundheim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)