User talk:Pastmat

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fishbowl California has been accepted
 Fishbowl California, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 05:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fishbowl_California help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Rotten Tomatoes
Please don't qualify the critic as a "Rotten Tomatoes" critic on Fishbowl California. He doesn't work for RT, he's just an approved critic. Saying he's a RT critic is misleading. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 20:35, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Understood, thank you! Shall I re-edit it or would you prefer to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pastmat (talk • contribs)
 * Thanks for understanding. I can fix it –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 20:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * thank you! :)

April 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Fishbowl California. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 20:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC)