User talk:PatakaZikatuna

Please join our discussion at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Dloh  cierekim  15:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't get it, why is Vell Baria article was deleted, it has cited references there if that article has not cited any references it must be nominated for deletion.. --PatakaZikatuna (talk) 02:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I got it now because all references are very poor ???? Dloh cierekim  make the Vell Baria article back to normal it is very hard to make that article  Dloh  cierekim  ok I am begging you now but I'm now understanding your critics. --PatakaZikatuna (talk) 02:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode)


The article Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability of stub article not demonstrated. Delete with no-redirect as the non-hat version is already occupied by the series that spawned from this and the Dramarama series already has a page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 02:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Final warning
Once more, you have attempted to create a biography of Vell Baria, this time under the name Vell. Like its predecessors it has been deleted, as you have failed to establish notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines. The way in which you persistently recreate this biography under various names in order to get around the salting of the previous names is patently disruptive. Please refrain from doing so again, or you will end up being blocked from editing. Furthermore, I must ask you not to recreate the article in your user space. As explained in WP:STALEDRAFT, such user space drafts are only allowed when there is a realistic chance of them becoming real articles. At present, this is not the case. I must emphasize the seriousness of this problem. You have been reported to the administrators' notice board twice, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive645#Totally_fishy._Help_me_out_here. October 23, 2010] and June 11, 2011, so patience is wearing thin. Favonian (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for disruptive editing, continual re-creation of the article Vell Baria, including deliberately varying the name to circumvent salting, and disobeying a specific instruction just above not to re-create it yet again as a user subpage. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

I can guarantee you this will be declined; to save everyone some time, please review the guide for block-appeals and write something else. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter (Dramarama Episode) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter (Dramarama Episode) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter (Dramarama Episode) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 00:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Additionally nominating
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the same discussion location. Hasteur (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated creation of non-notable biography in spite of previous block and many warnings. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)