User talk:Patch455

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Airbus A330, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! DBaK (talk) 23:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Your recent editing history at Airbus A330 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Image would be fine without the unnecessary black and white filter. Patch455 (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring on Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —  Manti  core  12:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Manti  core  12:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Airbus A330. BilCat (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Distruptive editing on “List of busiest container ports”
Please stop editing disruptively even if you believe you are right, it is entirely unconstructive. Wikipedia is a place where verifiability and reliable sources are paramount and I provided those. You have a history of edit warring and I implore you to change your ways. Best regards. Andro611 (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Seeing that you have ignored my plead I am compelled to report you for violating the Three revert rule Andro611 (talk) 10:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

This is the second time I try to reason with you. Ad hominems and reverting my edits with no stated reason will get you nowhere. Do you want reliable sources to back up my edits? No problem: AFP ”southern Chinese city” [], “special administrative region of China” [], Reuters ”...China's freest city” [], Guardian ”Hong Kong has been one of just two cities in China...” [] All of these point to the fact that the Kwai Tsing Container Terminals, which are of course in Hong Kong, are in the country of China. If the field was asking for region or city then, yes, you would be right. But it's not. Andro611 (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andro611 (talk) 10:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of busiest container ports. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Manti  core  10:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring on List of busiest container ports
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of busiest container ports. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * I have noticed that you seem to approach Wikipedia as a battleground, evidenced by your combative editing style (including edit warring), and use of personal attacks against other editors. This type of behaviour is inconsistent with the expectations of editors here. If you don't shape up soon, you may find yourself losing editing privileges permanently. — Manti  core  01:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

I see that you are continuing to engage in an edit war without responding to my message above. You can consider this a final warning to stop this behaviour before you are (again) reported for edit warring. — Manti  core  20:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MartinezMD (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring on Skene's gland
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Skene's gland. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —  Manti  core  08:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked from editing Skene's gland for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Regarding this edit summary, you evidently do not understand WP:BRD. You have made a change which other editors have disagreed with and reverted. The onus is now on you to convince other editors of the need for this change on the article talk page. I suggest you stop being combative and edit warring, and try to collaborate with other editors. — Manti  core  20:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MartinezMD (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Skene's gland. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)