User talk:Patcleary

Deletions
Any idea who has been deleting the material on the Enmore Church? I suspect it's someone involved in the wars that have been going on.

Sardaka (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi-yes you are spot on and only a lunatic would continue to delete information that is meant as useful inromation for other users. The 'wars' are now over as we just won a case in the NSW Supreme Court although we intend to pursue those who started the war in the first place. But I see you have had your own problems on wikipedia and these 'trolls' can be annoying but will not win. Lucky you do yoga !!..very good for the soul. best wishes.

I'm the one who took the shot of the Enmore church that you used on the blog page. I've put a new one in the Enmore article, taken last Saturday in better weather. You're welcome to use it if you want to. The old one looks a bit gloomy. When do classes resume at Enmore?

Sardaka (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

I see you've already used it. Definitely looks better.

Sardaka (talk) 09:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Spiritualist organizations has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://enmorechurch.blogspot.com. (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)