User talk:Pateca

December 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Íñigo Errejón has been reverted. Your edit here to Íñigo Errejón was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://cmiproducciones.wordpress.com/inigo-errejon-galvan/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Íñigo Errejón) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Íñigo Errejón, Pateca!

Wikipedia editor Mwenzangu just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Correct the date values on the references."

To reply, leave a comment on Mwenzangu's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Image sizes
While we appreciate the updating of images please be aware that per WP:NFCC, we require non frees to be at small size, for album covers, 300x300px. --M ASEM (t) 23:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Racism in Poland, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Eddsworld
Hi there, I was wondering, was the page Eddsworld not a full page before, and if so, am I able to obtain a copy of the previous page or access to revision history. Thanks CDRL102 (talk) 23:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * A full page used to exist, but it was soon nominated for deletion. However, here's an archived copy of it on the Wayback Machine. Pateca (talk) 06:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! CDRL102 (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NormalBoots


A tag has been placed on NormalBoots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Proposed deletion of Book:The Signpost


The book Book:The Signpost has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: "1 page book. Download as PDF feature is simpler for 1 page."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the book's talk page.

Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes still exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)