User talk:Patersonap

AfD nomination of Ali Paterson
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ali Paterson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ali Paterson. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kevin with titles smaller.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kevin with titles smaller.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Third Testament: The Antichrist and the Harlot


The article The Third Testament: The Antichrist and the Harlot has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that this film is notable. Fails WP:N. No Google News hits, only 48 distinct Google hits, most of these download sites, imdb sites, or wikipedia mirrors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)