User talk:Patrat46

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to National Rifle Association. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.Niteshift36 (talk) 01:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Rifle Association. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Rifle Association, you may be blocked from editing. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Rifle Association, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

NRA oldest or not
I know what the second amendment says. What it does NOT say is that militias are civil rights orgs. Your WP:OR is unsourced and faulty. Continually adding it is nothing less than vandalism. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Security of a free state.... if that isnt protecting the rights of a state then i dont know what is sure its not a civil rights organization that protects just African Americans but theres more rights then just the rights of African Americans they arent the only ones that have civil rights an organization made to defend the civil rights of select people is no more a civil rights organization then an organization made with the purpose of protecting the civil rights of a STATE the concept is the same just a different scale Patrat46 (talk) 02:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Repeating yourself won't make it true. Read the policies on WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calabe1992 (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at National Rifle Association. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tiptoety talk 03:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Civil and political rights are a class of rights that protect individuals' freedom from unwarranted infringement by governments and private organizations, and ensure one's ability to participate in the civil and political life of the state without discrimination or repression. (on Wikipedia the into to Civil Rights) AS such an orgainization that has that as its purpose is a civil rights organization this is common sense NOT research NOT an opinion SOLID FACT the definition of civil rights organization is an accurate discription to many militia's tho not all militia's but as i stated there are old militia's such as Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts who fought to MAKE THE USA FIGHTING FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS THAT WE HAVE TODAY! they are still around and still believe in the things they fought forPatrat46 (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * As the claim that they are the oldest continual Civil Rights Organization originates from the NRA themselves and thir primary purpose is not defending civil rights but defending civil liberties i believe that using them as a source is bias they did aid in the civil rights movement but their primary contribution was aimed at defending the civil liberties of the moment and it was only after the fact that they made a shift to aid as a civil rights organization... while they are old and they have not broken up at any given time they have not been a continual civil rights organization as they have not been a civil rights organization from the start but later came into it they might be the oldest organization that now fights for civil rights


 * so i can make the claim that the US Federal government is the oldest civil rights organization in the us. why? they made you civil rights... they are an organization... they debate what is a civil right.... so they are a civil rights organization with the same claim as the NRA whos purpose is to defend CIVIL LIBERTIES not CIVIL RIGHTS Patrat46 (talk) 17:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)