User talk:Patrician Vetinari

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lloyd Irving Rough.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lloyd Irving Rough.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Presea Combatir's age in Dawn of the New World. I was not disputing that her body is that of a fourteen year old. The official website has not denied this, and we know that she is thirty and is aware of this herself. I don't see any problem with putting "30 chronologically", when she is thirty, and putting "14 physically" when she has the body of a fourteen year old. What is the problem? The website would put '14' simply to avoid overcomplicating things for people who haven't played the first game. What's wrong with: Age: 14 physically (30 chronologically)? Or vice versa?

No no, Presea knows that she's thrity; she mentions at the end of Symphonia that "[she's] twenty-eight years old now", and even forgets that she has a fourteen-year-old body which is evident when she forgets that she is meant to be roughly the same age as Genis. If anything, it should be put under 'age' along with her physical age because, quite simply, it's true.

Fine, but the reasons for listing both ages outweight those against. There is no good reason not to put her chronological age under 'age', when the fact is true. It's stupid not to include both.

Thanks.DragonZero (talk) 05:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)