User talk:Patriciaskelding

June 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philip Cross (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your way of describing what a person does is discriminating. Who are you to decide whether there is or is not a conspiracy. Some of the info this guy gives us is checkable and what his video's have shown is actually factual in talking about radar. You cannot put degrading labels on people without knowing whether he is right or wrong, so you should be neutral which this piece shows you are not. Therefore, it tends to lead the public to the suggestion that you yourselves are propagating untruths by making their work seem trivial and insane. You are not qualified to know about what he has found. I have always contributed to your account but it will stop now as you show discrimination. Patriciaskelding (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The comments above were not my words, they were a Wikipedia template message. The article is not based on the opinions of editors as Wikipedia uses reliable sources and this project can only use such sources. They report that Mr Steele's theories are not credible drawing on the work of properly qualified specialists. Philip Cross (talk) 10:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * However, you are welcome to argue your case on Talk:Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist) where the issue about using the "conspiracy theorist" label has already been raised. But it is likely the opinions of other editors will not differ significantly from mine. Philip Cross (talk) 10:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

After seeing how you protect your own writings which try to give you some prestige without any person giving you acclamation... then I have realised all this editing you do of Wikipedia is boast. I shall not be entertaining it anymore. Goodbye. Patriciaskelding (talk) 12:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Mark Steele is definitely a conspiracy theory. He is best known for promoting theories which lack a basis in evidence, such as the claim that lamp-posts in Gateshead contain 5G energy weapons. If you feel that some of Steele's claims are "checkable", and by this I assume you mean verifiable, please disclose that information. --Salimfadhley (talk) 22:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

You ha ve just proven his point with all your blocking if freedom of speech. Who the hell do you think you all are .... GOD? Do not bother me you are the usual sheep or part of the problems we have. Patriciaskelding (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)