User talk:Patrick.ucciardo

About the user page
Hi Patrik.ucciardo! You were right, I cannot see a thing on your userpage... Did you try to write with the "edit source" button instead of using the "edit" one? Are you sure you saved your changes upon completion? Did you use Internet Explorer?--Navarco (talk) 21:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * What about this page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Patrick.ucciardo/be_bold --Navarco (talk) 21:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Collaboration etc
Dear Patrick Good choice .- the rewards system is v important in the transformation of the justice system. i think you could usefully collaborate on the matter of turning king's/queen's evidence. Fenice89 has chose this topic  but not left her/hiss signature. Ask in class on Monday - or ask Navarco how to contact! --Jfclegg (talk) 21:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Possible images
Hi Patrick, take a look here: http://broadsides.law.harvard.edu/home.php There are at least three broadsides with rewards: As you can read here http://broadsides.law.harvard.edu/faq.php#post_image there is no copyright, just remember to insert the link to the exact page.--Navarco (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * http://pds.lib.harvard.edu/pds/view/4788306
 * http://pds.lib.harvard.edu/pds/view/4788237
 * http://pds.lib.harvard.edu/pds/view/4788336

Revison
This article could be expanded and improved greatly. The importance of rewards in attempts to stimulate prosecutions is oit considered, neither is its effect on thief- talking. There is nothing about fictional representations... --Jfclegg (talk) 22:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Rewards on the OBO
If you put "reward" in the key word box you get over 2000 results. I don't suggest you red them all. Not all of these are rewards as provided for by legislation. You could limit by choosing an offence and inserting start and finish dates. Have you looked at the Beggar's Opera with an eye to the rewards? --Jfclegg (talk) 14:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Sandbox
I havent asked anyone else to hand in their sand box so I couldnt take take it into account in evaluation. Best wishes--Jfclegg (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)