User talk:Patrick burns1

Speedy deletion of Robert B. Stephan
A tag has been placed on Robert B. Stephan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Robert B. Stephan
Being a high government official doesn't, by itself, merit an article (as its successful deletion would suggest). The article appeared to be a standard biographical sketch copied here without any indication of why this guy is notable. Take a look at the guidelines at WP:BIO and see if Stephan meets these requirements. If so, feel free to rewrite the article, citing reliable secondary sources that make his notability clear. Thanks! TheMolecularMan (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

You need to check your list of DHS "officials" and perhaps consider a purge; many of them are beneath even the Assistant Secretary level. I will consider a re-write when I am convinced of a consistency in standards.Patrick burns1 (talk) 21:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)