User talk:Patricksfisher2

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:User from Los Alamos has been accepted
 Template:User from Los Alamos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! KylieTastic (talk) 12:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:hometownLosAlamos (January 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:hometownLosAlamos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:UBX/borninLosAlamos has been accepted
 User:UBX/borninLosAlamos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your signature
This is a reminder that your signature on a discussion page needs to include a link in accordance with WP:SIGLINK. I wonder whether you may have tried to customise your signature and erroneously ticked the "Treat the above as wiki markup" box at Special:Preferences? --David Biddulph (talk) 06:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Another point on sortable tables
I notice that in the wildfires table in Los Alamos, New Mexico the sort button wasn't visible. This was because of the problem reported at Help:Sorting, so I've corrected it in and hence the sort button is now visible. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:hometownLosAlamos


Hello, Patricksfisher2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:hometownLosAlamos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Meteorite classification
I was bouncing through random articles and came across Meteorite classification. As I began to read it, I was struck by how clearly written it was. So many science articles seemed intended to intimidate rather then educate. When I looked at the history, I saw that you had done significant rewriting of the article. Comparing the article now to before your edits, the improvement is impressive. So, thanks for the work you did on the article, you made it a pleasure to read. Schazjmd  (talk)  00:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I wanted for myself and others to understand the article—I am not a specialist by any means, however I think it is important for articles like these to be more clear and unbiased. 2601:8C3:8200:2B60:81E2:911E:41BA:9A5A (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)