User talk:Patrickthomas93

August 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ashley John-Baptiste has been reverted. Your edit here to Ashley John-Baptiste was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/AshleyJBaptiste/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Ashley John-Baptiste have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. ''I've added https://mycovenant.org.uk to the external link section at the end of the article. The other link was already there.'' Tacyarg (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
Hi, I'm wondering if you work for talent4media given some of your edits? If so, please see the conflict of interest links I'm about to post. Tacyarg (talk) 12:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Tacyarg,
 * I can confirm I work for T4M, our client, Ashley has asked for us to make these changes, we are simply highlighting his work reel rather than imparting promotional or opinion based content. Is there any way around this please?
 * Best,
 * Patrick Patrickthomas93 (talk) 13:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for confirming your conflict of interest. Please follow the links below for fuller information, but the short version is that you may post requests on the article's Talk page for others to make the edits. Tacyarg (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, to comply with the mandatory and non-negotiable paid editing disclosure policy, you should make a highly visible disclosure using the template on your userpage (User:Patrickthomas93). On the same page you should also list the name of every client whose article you have already edited, or plan to in the future. I see that you have already edited the articles of Matt Baker, Gloria Hunniford and Lindsey Russell, all of whom are talent4media clients. Please do not make any further edits to articles until you provide this required disclosure. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Patrickthomas93. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Patrickthomas93! Your additions to Ashley John-Baptiste have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 12:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)