User talk:Patriot123456

Tax protester constitutional arguments
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Please do not add tax protester rhetoric to Wikipedia. See Talk:Tax protester/Request for comment.

The material you added is not only incorrect, it is in some cases blatantly false. Also, it is prohibited original research AND is unsourced. Please review Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

The statement that the Coppage case overruled or over turned the Sisemore case is nonsensical. Coppage was decided long before Sisemore. For case B to overrule case A, case B must have been decided AFTER case A. Second, as noted in the article, Coppage was not even a tax case. Sisemore was a tax case. Therefore, Coppage could not have "overruled" Sisemore, even if it had been decided after Sisemore. To "overrule" a case means to actually rule in opposition to the ruling in the earlier case. Obviously, Coppage could not have overruled ANY CASE INVOLVING FEDERAL TAXATION, since there IS NO RULING IN COPPAGE on any federal tax issue.

Please review Precedent and Stare decisis. Yours, Famspear (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)