User talk:Patriot130

Welcome
Tea Party notes Sched

Speedy deletion nomination of National Tea Party Federation
A tag has been placed on National Tea Party Federation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 23:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Tea Party movement
I am not making a war. I just returned a lot of missing stuff that no one mentioned on discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriot130 (talk • contribs)
 * It's there, also in Talk:Tea Party protests. It may not be all inclusive, the Breitbart vs. Trumka is the biggest of the disputed content. †TE†  Talk  23:59, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Patriot130, don't let these folks intimidate you; you are as qualified to make edits as anyone here, and that includes deleting material which does not qualify for inclusion according to Wikipedia standards as well as adding back strongly sourced, pertinent deleted material. See WP:Be Bold and WP:Anyone can edit.  Welcome and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.  Freedom Fan (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I couldn't agree more. Learning to edit Wikipedia is tough enough without overzealous editors (such as myself) jumping all over you. †TE†  Talk  18:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Tea Party thing
Join the discussion on the talk page about the Breitbart thing. I don't think you are edit warring. I think you're just new. Fasten your seatbelt. It's a bumpy page. Malke 2010  00:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Reading wiki and editing wiki are completely different. I need to read more on article creation. I got a lot of errors on my first attempt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriot130 (talk • contribs)
 * Please sign your name at the end of your comments by typing four tildes (~), like this: . †TE†   Talk  18:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)