User talk:PattonPending

Time Trotters article
Hi. Can you please give a link to some of the Time Trotters episodes on gamespot.com? As fas as I know there was only one episode of it. I do feel you have made this whole Time Trotters article up, haven't you? :)


 * I've taken a look around on GameSpot for you, but as far as I can tell, the streaming versions of all the episodes except the season finale were taken down to help spur sales of the DVD set. However, the big redesign the website went through in 2005 changed where a lot of the older content was stored, and *many* video links and embedded pictures for features like GameSpotting Live! have worked intermittently or not at all since then.  In other words, I may not be looking in the right place, so I'd recommend posting on GameSpot's forums about your interest in seeing more episodes.  Thanks for your interest in my article! PattonPending 05:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The interesting thing is that the DVD box set is nowhere to be found, though according to your article it was released in april 2005. It should at least be in gamespot store. They announced the E3 2005 DVD set not long after the show in may 2005, and I bought it just a few weeks ago in gamespot store..
 * It would be nice of you to at least provide the link to gamespot's announcement of the Time Trotters DVD(on april 12th, 2005 as you claim in the article), as your article has been created very recently, and I doubt you kept the date of their announcement in your head for a full year..
 * oh, whatever.. lets stop the b***shit, It's clear you made the whole article up(made even more evident by the lack of google results when trying to find anything related to TT), and you should be happy that I haven't reported your article for deletion, as Wikipedia IS a SERIOUS website, with SERIOUS articles, as much as you don't want to admit it. I would just suggest you to not create any more of these false articles!
 * btw, The final proof :) (taken from http://www.geocities.com/willkknight/faq.txt) :


 * Q: Where can I see the other 18 episodes? I clicked all the other links in the episode
 * guide and nothing comes up? Are they good? Can you tell me what happens in them?


 * A: There are no other episodes...it was really just a joke. Please don't hurt me.



Deletion tags
Do not remove speedy delete tags. I tagged the article for AfD before I had realized you improperly removed a tag which had been labeled for speedy deletion. You are supposed to place a tag under the speedy delete tag if you wish to contest a speedy delete. That is explicitly stated in the speedy delete tag itself. --Strothra 20:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'm sorry about that: I have no interest in breaking Wikipedia's rules or vandalizing anybody's work. If you check my contributions, I think you'll find that I've tried to improve articles when I notice spelling or typographical errors.  I acted in this case because I'm concerned about the prospect of having an article I spend three weeks researching and writing deleted because someone named "Delkart" insists on tagging them for deletion without offering any discussion here or on the page's "Discussion" page.  As you consider this article for deletion, I would urge you to read this thread and think about why GameSpot would weigh the possibilties of re-releasing Time Trotters on HD or Blu-Ray DVD if the series allegedly doesn't exist. PattonPending 21:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't think that you intend to be a bad editor but please be more careful about reading the tags before you remove them. I never stated that the series doesn't exist.  I simply put it up for AfD so that it's notability could be discussed and decided upon by the entire Wiki community. --Strothra 21:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * That's fair. For clarity, what I was referencing was the fact that Delkart's given reason for wanting the article deleted was that it's "total nonsense."  I'm confident that as you and the rest of the community examine the facts at hand, you'll see that this is simply not the case.  Like I said in the Time Trotters discussion page, Wikipedia has articles on many things that I've never even heard of -- that seems like a poor reason for Delkart to flag something for urgent removal from the website.  I hope you'll contact me if there's anything further I can do to help resolve this matter!  Thank you for your prompt response. PattonPending 21:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello PattonPending. I would like to turn your attention to the following page(as mentioned before in your usertalk)


 * http://www.geocities.com/willkknight/faq.txt


 * There, the author of that time trotters fan page, admits that there was only 1 episode.
 * Please don't be a complete lunatic and argue anymore. The website I provided is all the evidence anyone ever needs, not to mention that you make me prove that time trotters doesn't exist. Well guess what, wiseguy.. YOU are the one who needs to provide the evidence that the series EXISTS. Following your logic, I could write an article about green monkies who live on the moon, and when someone suggests deletion, I call them dumb, for not providing evidence that the monkies DON't exist.. PATHETIC!!!
 * How ya gonna defend yourself now, mister lunatic?

Notability of Carrie Gouskos
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Carrie Gouskos, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Carrie Gouskos seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Carrie Gouskos, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Carrie Gouskos itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:SarahHamilton.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SarahHamilton.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 21:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of Sucky Gaming Site
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sucky Gaming Site, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sucky Gaming Site provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sucky Gaming Site, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GamingTrend2006.png
Thanks for uploading Image:GamingTrend2006.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GamingTrendLogo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:GamingTrendLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TriviaRobot.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:TriviaRobot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gaming Trend
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Gaming Trend. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Gaming Trend (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GamingTrendLogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:GamingTrendLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GamingTrend2006.png
 Thanks for uploading File:GamingTrend2006.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Sarah Hamilton (voice actress) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Hamilton (voice actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sarah Hamilton (voice actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Sarah Hamilton (voice actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Hamilton (voice actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sarah Hamilton (voice actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)