User talk:PattyGatliff

November 2016
Hello, I'm DRAGON BOOSTER. I noticed that you recently removed some content from University of the Cumberlands without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DRAGON BOOSTER  ★  18:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

You also reverted again, which is frowned upon. If you think you can make a case for the exclusion of well-documented material, you should make that case on the talk page of the article. - Nunh-huh 23:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary, by the way — that "this is not relevant to the current institution" — is clearly wrong. In 2015, the University of the Cumberlands asked for, and obtained, exemptions from Title IX in the areas of admissions, recruitment, education programs and activities, and employment. It cited the Kentucky Baptist Convention’s tenets on marriage, sex outside of marriage, sexual orientation, gender identity, pregnancy and abortion as areas of conflict with Title IX. The University continues to discriminate in those areas to the present day, and are permitted to on the basis of their religious beliefs.  - Nunh-huh 00:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to University of the Cumberlands, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Fei noh a  Talk 14:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)