User talk:Pattycakekwan888/Diatom Particles/BarajasApril4118 Peer Review

Lead Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - there's no lead yet posted Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - there's no lead Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - there's no lead Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?- there's no lead Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - there's no lead Content Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? - yes one hundred percent Is the content added up-to-date? - yes, double checked Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - there is a lot of information missing Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - no it does not. Tone and Balance Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? yes, needs more information though Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - this article is more factual and informative, therefore not biased. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - I feel like more can be said, and go more in depth Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?- no, it does not Sources and References Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - yes it is Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)- yes they do, very good job on that. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - yes they do very well Are the sources current? - they are not the most recent but semi current Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - somewhat Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) I believe if you look little deeper you can find better sources to use Check a few links. Do they work? - yes they do work. Organization Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - yes it is and very organized Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - I did not see any Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - it is extremely well organized just needs a lot more information which Is understandable because it is a draft Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?- no not yet Are images well-captioned? - there are no images Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? no Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - no For New Articles Only If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes, it does How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? - yes it does Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? - somewhat but it has its own style to it Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? - not that I was able to see Overall impressions Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - its very infromative and very straight forward which is really good. What are the strengths of the content added? - some strengths is the type of information that is placed into the article and how the article is organized How can the content added be improved? - it can be improved by adding more information and staying organized