User talk:Paul.gugger

Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://maps.thefullwiki.org/Coast_Douglas-fir.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quercus sagraeana
It's my understanding that the correct scientific name for this species is Quercus cubana A.Rich., Hist. Phys. Cuba, Pl. Vasc. 2: 230 (1841). Do you have an updated source for the name Quercus sagraeana? The closest thing I can find is Quercus virginiana var. sagrana (Nutt.) Trel., Mem. Natl. Acad. Sci. 20: 113 (1924) or possibly Quercus oleoides var. sagrana (Nutt.) C.H.Mull., Amer. Midl. Naturalist 65: 37 (1961). Of course, under the rules of the latest convention of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants dictates Q. cubana takes precedence if either of these is the source for the name Q. sagraeana. Otherwise, could you point me to where the name Q. sagraeana was published and why it should take precedence over the earlier name?

Thank you and a very interesting article you published about the origins of this Oak!

--Kmanblue (talk) 10:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)