User talk:Paul.t.scott

Welcome!
Hello, Paul.t.scott, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as August Jackson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  21:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of August Jackson


A tag has been placed on August Jackson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  21:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Editing with a conflict of interest
Hello, Paul.t.scott. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Given your talk page note on the now deleted article talk page, you have both a conflict of interest and a complete misunderstanding as to how Wikipedia works.--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Regarding August Jackson
The article was deleted under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please see the above messages for more information. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 23:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:August Jackson Organization Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:August Jackson Organization Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: August Jackson (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:August Jackson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:August_Jackson Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:August_Jackson reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello Paul.t.scott. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:August Jackson, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Paul.t.scott. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ''As you have declared that you are employed by August Jackson you are, by definition, paid to edit the draft. Please correct your COI box on your User Page.'' 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for attending to this 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I added the disclosure per your request. However, I am an IT Director for Arc Services and I am paid to run the IT department. They don't pay me to edit Wikipedia or engage in marketing efforts. Which is why I didn't think this was a conflict. I started this because I wanted to see the company history where I have worked for the last 12 years documented. I am hoping other former employees will chime in to fill it out more and make it more interesting. Paul &#34;TheMacGuy&#34; Scott (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd say it was borderline, but you have been transparent, which is all one can ask. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Someone is trying to delete the article again. I am being transparent I have included citations. Why does this keep happening? Paul &#34;TheMacGuy&#34; Scott (talk) 22:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:August Jackson


A tag has been placed on Draft:August Jackson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Please don't delete my page. I am working hard to make this compliant and I did as I was asked when I submitted it. Paul &#34;TheMacGuy&#34; Scott (talk) 22:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What do I need to do to get this page started? Paul &#34;TheMacGuy&#34; Scott (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Paul &#34;TheMacGuy&#34; Scott (talk) 01:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

No one else touches my account. My use or our is a pronoun is a personal choice. No where in the article does the word our appear only on the talk pages with other people. Are you using my pronoun choice as an excuse to ban me? Also I listed three sources outside the companies website and other than our URL in the info box nothing linked to any of the company web pages. So it seems to me the reason for by banning is improper. Our purpose of the article isn't for perspective clients, that is what our website is for, and if there is an error or language problem in the text that is what edits are for? Isn't anyone free to edit published pages? Deleting an entire article and banning the writer seems to be quite the over reaction.


 * You may have only one unblock request at a time. You may, however, alter your latest unblock request as long as there hasn't been a response.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


 * You have wasted enough of our time. You make it sound as if you're a long-term constructive editor who's made only "one mistake in 16 years". This is untrue and disingenuous. You created your account on June 26, 2007. Your first edit was a now-deleted edit on November 6, 2007. Your next edit wasn't until November 22, 2012, five years later. Overall, you have made a grand total of 62 edits, including the edits to this Talk page after your block, of which 28 are live and 34 are deleted edits, all but one of which were to your company, in article form in 2022 and then in draft form this month. The last edit you made to an unrelated article was on January 22, 2016. I have revoked your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)