User talk:Paul3047

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Wolf (April 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebastian Wolf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sebastian Wolf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sebastian_Wolf Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CommanderWaterford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sebastian_Wolf reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem
Hello Paul3047! Your additions to Draft:Sebastian Wolf have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * thank you, fixed it Paul3047 (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

The draft

 * Don't copy stuff
 * Early life and education content needs to be referenced.
 * External links - only his website.
 * Existence of a person's name as a red Wikilink means there could be an article about that person, but not guarantee that there is sufficient information to be an article.
 * Other stuff exists - There are tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of existing articles that do not meet current standards, and should be deleted. Pointing at those is not a rationale for accepting your Declined draft.
 * SW may not be notable. Unless there is published content ABOUT SW, he does not meet Wikipedia's definition of notability. Referenced descriptions of his work and where it has been exhibited count for zero as far as notability.
 * Per the comment left at Teahouse, all academic assignments are supposed to go through the Wikipedia program. It is completely unrealistic for a teacher to assign creation of an article. David notMD (talk) 12:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks for your advice Paul3047 (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The backlog of drafts is not a queue. Reviewers select what they want to review from the 'pile.' It could be days, weeks, or (sadly) months until a reviewer looks at your resubmitted draft. David notMD (talk) 16:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

The teacher should be made aware of Education program rather than just telling students to try to create articles. The latter is a disservice to the students, to Wikipedia (if they by-pass the review process and create flawed articles that need to be deleted), or wastes the time of the volunteer draft reviewers if flawed drafts are submitted to Articles for Creation. David notMD (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sebastian Wolf (artist) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sebastian Wolf (artist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you! Paul3047 (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Wolf (artist) (April 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebastian Wolf (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sebastian Wolf (artist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sebastian_Wolf_(artist) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GoingBatty&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sebastian_Wolf_(artist) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 17:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Wolf (artist) has been accepted
 Sebastian Wolf (artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sebastian_Wolf_(artist) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)