User talk:PaulSC

First of all welcome. I hope you will enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. I have, for the moment, put back (some of) what I deleted from the IR35 page. I am, however, concerned about the 3 in 1000 claim. Wikipedia is not a primary source, and everything should be verifiable - primarily by citing sources. If you can provide a source for the 3 in 1000 claim - perhaps by putting it on Talk:IR35 - it will bolster the case for that information to stay.

Oh, by the way, you can (and ideally should) sign your messages on talk pages by using four tildes, like this: ~.

Once again, welcome. OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * My apologies. I see that you have already done exactly what I've just asked you to do, and provided sources on the talk page. Very careless of me not to check. In that case, that information can be included in the article. OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm afraid I can't personally be any further help with your debate about IR35 - I don't have any specialist knowledge about the issue. My concerns earlier were more to do with the process of including unverified (and potentially controversial) information without citing sources. In fact, that might again be the best advice here. Rather than relying on explaining the law as you see it, find an external source that backs up your claim. And aim to find as independent a source as possible - an article from, for example, the BBC, would tend to carry more weight than from a (potentially biased) trade association.

If you still can't find agreement, the next route would probably be to see if you can get more people to look at the article, either with a request for comment or perhaps a note to the UK Wikipedians' notice board. Good luck. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)